Image Source: Firosnv. Photography
The emergency response field demands immediate, urgent action from all personnel, from dispatch to direct aid.
Such constraints and environments pose critical challenges for user experience (UX) design across websites, mobile apps, and all connected devices. Time is truly of the essence. Both personnel and requesters demand fast, accessible, and reliable user interfaces.
UX designers must also operate with a strong sense of urgency, employing reliability patterns to ensure the resilience, responsiveness, and effectiveness of emergency UX.
What Are Reliability Patterns?
UX designers and engineers use reliability patterns to test system interface functionality and resilience, ensuring they're designed to recover from failure.
Therein lies the first challenge: failure isn't an option in emergency response.
Whether it’s a dispatch interface for a police department or a website that helps people connect with licensed bail agents in Los Angeles, reliability patterns must be tested in isolated environments before applications are deployed.
Reliability patterns check for message functionality or the data exchanged between systems. These patterns reveal if messages are "getting lost in translation," which could cause a system crash during a crisis.
1. Queue-backed Intake with Retries
One critical reliability pattern in emergency response is queue-backed intake with retries.
For example, standard web requests for any website or application follow a synchronous "request-response" cycle, where the exchange of data is in sync. However, in an emergency, a sudden surge in web traffic can overwhelm emergency response servers. Testing for such a case in an isolated environment would reveal 500-level errors or even data loss.
The queue-backed intake reliability pattern is applied, using a message broker tool, until the system successfully receives an emergency request during the traffic surge. A UX designer should keep testing the reliability pattern until reliable communication between system components and servers is achieved, even when traffic disrupts synchronicity.
2. Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Testing
While AI-powered systems may operate at lightning speed, they still lack the nuance of human-based judgment. In emergency response, this judgment is vital. Human-in-the-loop (HITL) reliability patterns ensure that communication systems alert human personnel when confidence in an automated component's functionality drops.
3. Low-Bandwidth Resilience
Users rely on 5G and wireless connectivity to access emergency phone numbers, SMS messaging, websites, and mobile apps. People in need of emergency services should be able to get through to a responder even with 2G connectivity.
UX designers and engineers must run reliability patterns to ensure these channels are operational when high-speed networks shut down. In these cases, a high-bandwidth request must pivot to low-bandwidth successfully. Responders should be able to retrieve the emergency type and location of the requester, even through the weakest network signals.
This reliability pattern ties into another critical test, location-aware routing. It tests multiple ways to leverage cell towers and GPS to bypass regional constraints and central dispatch delays that can prevent emergency alerts from reaching proper local authorities.
Build a Resilient Emergency UX
There's no time to waste in the emergency response field, and this includes UX design across all devices. Rigorous reliability pattern testing is absolutely critical for all communication systems, from laptops to smartphones, ensuring that requests are received on any network during any crisis.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about this topic