Smartphone home page
Image: Here
Recommendation systems moved from "nice to have" to "core product" the moment users got used to apps that simply know what they want next. But that's where many teams slip. They jump to algorithms and skip the design questions that tie recommendations to outcomes like engagement, retention, and revenue.
It's also worth noting that the recommendation surface in modern apps is everywhere, not just a single carousel. Recent advances in embeddings and large models make it easier to connect sparse behaviors with rich content, which expands what you can recommend and to whom. But more power brings more choices, so the craft is in making small, testable bets and wiring the system to learn quickly from user responses. In the pages below, we ground this in a concrete domain, then step back to metrics and architecture patterns you can apply in any app.
Inside the algorithms of high-engagement game apps
This category definitely belongs to modern games that are considered very engaging for their customers. In particular, it's useful to examine how online casinos work. Why? Because unlike video or arcade games, these are not single titles and usually present a big library of various games which usually involve money (so players are already hyped).
If you are building recommendations around real money poker, the unit of value is a session that feels tailored to the player's style, skill, and mood. A good system does not simply sort the lobby. It understands which poker game formats and table conditions create flow for this person now. That starts with feature planning.
Player-level features can include recent hands, preferred speeds, buy-in ranges, and positional tendencies. Session context can include time of day, device type, historical length of play, and response to prior offers. Game context covers table pace, number of seats open, and variant dynamics like cash versus tournaments or short-handed tables.
Turning signals into suggestions
With those signals in place, think in two stages. First, retrieval narrows the candidate set to options that match the player's intent when they are playing poker. Two-tower or nearest-neighbor retrieval over embeddings is fast enough to personalize at the tap. Second, ranking balances predicted enjoyment, skill fit, expected session length, and bankroll settings.
For example, a player who likes fast games might start seeing more quick "turbo" tables to join. The system can also suggest practice tables or simple strategy lessons between games. That way, players can keep learning and having fun, without feeling stressed or rushed.
Platforms smartly incorporate those games with bold visuals, to make the recommendations more impactful. This one is taken from Ignition Casino's website.
Image: Here
Exploration matters too. Multi-armed bandits can safely test adjacent formats or table speeds without disrupting the player's rhythm. Feedback should be richer than clicks. Include dwell time at the table, voluntary continuation to another session, and soft signals like seat selection changes.
Offers can be personalized as well, but it's worth remembering that marketing plays a huge role as well. If we look deeper into how gaming sites operate, often it's not about game recommendations on their own, but combining them with marketing offers. Take a look at a social media post below. That's a promotion of table games, but rather than recommending game variations, the platform just says: we got a bonus for you, use it however you want.
What to measure, and what the market tells us
Before you pick models, decide what "better" means. Most teams track click-through rate on modules, but sustained gains show up in session length, repeat use, and revenue per active user. Industry numbers show this really matters. In 2024, people spent about $150 billion on in-app purchases, and used mobile apps for about 4.2 trillion hours total --- that's around 3.5 hours per person every day.
When apps and companies personalize things well (like showing the right offers to the right people), studies say they can make about 5--15% more money and spend up to 50% less to get new customers. These numbers help you choose good goals and decide how big your tests and experiments should be.
Table 1: A compact benchmark table you can use when shaping goals and test plans. The data sources are: Sensor Tower and McKinsey.
Created by us, specifically, for this article.
Translate these into product metrics. For example, aim for a 1--2% absolute lift in module CTR in week one of an A/B test, but hold yourself to retention or repeat-session gains by week four. Treat offline evaluation as a filter, not a finish line. Use calibrated ranking loss and coverage metrics to protect variety, then let online tests arbitrate trade-offs between short-term clicks and long-term use.
Architecture patterns that scale with your roadmap
A simple, well-working system is better than a super-smart model that is hard to use in real life.
You can think of it in three steps:
- Retrieval: first, you pick a small group of possible items from a huge list.
- Ranking: then, you sort that smaller group by how good or useful they seem.
- Re-ranking: finally, you tweak the order to respect extra rules, like "show newer things first," "don't show all the same type," or "show things that matter right now."
Modern systems also use special math "profiles" (called embeddings) for users, items, and situations. These are updated often (maybe every day for user and item profiles, and every hour for what's trending) so the recommendations stay fresh and relevant.
As you mature, large language models can help with cold-start and metadata quality, but they belong in well-bounded roles such as feature generation or semantic normalization.
The core purpose remains steady. As one recent survey highlights, "Recommender systems are an essential tool to relieve the information overload challenge and play an important role in people's daily lives." That role is expanding in practice.
